Trump claims he will nullify executive orders Joe Biden signed
President Donald Trump made a very strong claim recently. He said that he will cancel, or nullify, (Trump claims) some of the actions taken by former President Joe Biden.
The reason for his promise is specific and unusual. He claims that some of Biden’s Executive Orders have signed using an autopen. Trump claims
An autopen is a machine that signs a person’s name automatically. President Trump suggests that using this machine makes the orders illegal or less valid.
This claim is highly controversial. It brings up a big question: Does using a machine to sign a document make it invalid?
We will look at what an Executive Order is. It will see what an autopen is and why presidents use it. We will also explore why this legal challenge is very difficult and what the real purpose of President Trump’s claim might be.
Executive Orders and the Autopen Trump claims
To understand the claim, we must first understand the two core ideas: Executive Orders and the autopen machine.
What is an Executive Order?
An Executive Order has a powerful tool used by the President of the United States.
- It is a command. It tells the executive branch—the part of the government that carries out the laws—how to do its job. Trump claims
- It is law-like. It has the force of law. But it does not have to passed by Congress (the legislative branch).
- It is fast. Presidents use them to take quick action on big issues, like immigration or national security.
Executive Orders could easily undone by the next President. This is exactly what President Trump is promising to do.
What is the Autopen?
An autopen is not a new tool. It is a machine that holds a pen. It has programmed to perfectly copy a person’s signature.
- It is used for speed. Presidents and busy officials use the autopen when they need to sign thousands of letters or documents quickly. Trump claims
- It is a convenience. It allows the President to sign less important documents without having to stop their main work.
Presidents have used the autopen for decades. It is a common part of modern government.
The Legal Problem with the Claim Trump claims
President Trump’s claim is that using an autopen to sign Executive Orders makes them invalid. Legal experts strongly disagree with this idea. Trump claims
The Power of Intention
In U.S. law, what matters is the intention of the President.
If the President gives permission for the autopen to used, and if the President agrees with the action being taken, the signature has usually considered valid. It is the President’s mind and consent that makes the order official, not the physical act of signing. Trump claims
Courts have generally supported the idea that if the President decides to use a stamp, a proxy, or an autopen, the action is still official. Trump claims
The Precedent of History
President Trump’s claim also runs into a wall of history. Many Presidents have used some form of mechanical or delegated signing authority. Trump claims
- FDR and Truman: They used mechanical devices to sign thousands of documents during wartime.
- President Obama: He used an autopen to sign bills into law. This happened when he was traveling outside of the country. Trump claims
The use of the autopen, especially for non-critical documents or when the President is busy, is a long-standing tradition. Challenging it based only on the signature would be very difficult to win in a court of law. Trump claims
The Real Target of the Claim Trump claims
If the legal argument is weak, then why is President Trump making this claim? The answer is likely political.
The true target is not the autopen. It is the policies that the Executive Orders put in place.
The Political Message
President Trump is using the autopen claim to tell his supporters a clear political story:
- The Orders have Fake: By saying the orders were signed by a machine, he suggests the policies themselves have fake or sneaky.
- The Policies are Bad: The real goal is to get rid of policies President Trump does not like.
This is a way to create excitement and energy among his voters. He is saying: “I will not just disagree with the last President. I will treat his most important actions as if they never happened.”
The Easy Nullification
President Trump does not need a court ruling to cancel Joe Biden’s orders. As stated earlier, one President can easily undo the Executive Orders of a previous President.
He can simply sign a new Executive Order on his first day in office. That new order can state, “The Executive Order signed by President Biden on [Date] regarding [Policy] has hereby revoked.”
This is the standard and legal way to change a previous administration’s policy. The autopen claim is just a loud, political way to frame this standard action.
What This Means for Government Work Trump claims
The simple claim—that an autopen signature makes an order illegal—is harmful to the way government works.
Creating Bureaucratic Chaos
If President Trump starts checking the signature on every order, it creates a lot of chaos for government workers.
- Uncertainty: People working in government agencies will not know which rules to follow. Is the autopen order still law? Or is it canceled?
- Wasting Time: Agencies will waste time and money checking old paperwork instead of focusing on their important work.
This slows down the entire government. It creates massive uncertainty in areas like environmental protection, immigration enforcement, and trade.
The Risk of Retaliation
If President Trump nullifies autopen orders, the next President might also try to find any small flaw in President Trump’s signatures.
This creates a dangerous cycle. Every President will spend their time trying to undo the paperwork of the last President. The country will lose stability and consistency in its laws.
The Focus on Legitimate Concerns Trump claims
President Trump’s claim distracts from legitimate arguments against Executive Orders.
The real debate should be about whether presidents use too many Executive Orders.
- Too Much Power: Some people argue that presidents use Executive Orders to avoid Congress. They use them to make major policy changes quickly, without getting the approval of elected officials.
- Lack of Permanence: Because the next President can easily cancel the orders, the policies do not last. This creates instability in government and society.
The claim about the autopen is a distraction from this important, structural debate about the limits of Presidential power.
Trump’s Promise to Nullify
President Trump’s promise to nullify Joe Biden’s Executive Orders signed by autopen is a big political move. The legal claim—that the autopen makes the order invalid—is weak and goes against legal history.
The true goal of the promise is political. It is meant to energize his supporters and signal his immediate plan to reverse the policies of the previous administration.
While President Trump has the clear power to cancel any of the orders, using the autopen claim adds unnecessary chaos to the process. It threatens to create a destructive cycle where every President questions the paperwork of the last. The stability of the government relies on leaders respecting the official actions of their predecessors, regardless of how the signature was applied.
Read More Articles Click Here. Read Previous Article Click Here. Inspired by Al-Jazeera.
